Criticism Of Vroom%27s Expectancy Theory Of Motivation

15.10.2020by

Apr 06, 2018  This article describes Expectancy Theory by Victor Vroom in a practical way. After reading you will understand the definition and basics of this powerful motivation theory. What is Vroom’s Expectancy Theory? In 1964, Canadian professor of psychology Victor Vroom developed the Expectancy Theory. In it, he studied people’s motivation and concluded it depends on three factors: expectancy. Even though self-determination theory is a prevalent motivational theory, namely in the field of education, it does not go without some problems and criticisms. (1) It makes sense to distinguish. Thus, Vroom’s Expectancy Theory has its roots in the cognitive concept, i.e. How an individual processes the different elements of motivation. This theory is built around the concept of valence, instrumentality, and Expectancy and, therefore, is often called as VIE theory. The algebraic representation of Vroom’s Expectancy theory is. Expectancy Theory: An Integrative Theory of Motivation. More so than any other motivation theory, expectancy theory can be tied into most concepts of what and how people become motivated. Consider the following examples. Need theories state that we are motivated to satisfy our needs. We positively value outcomes that satisfy unmet needs.

Criticisms

Victor vroom

Some of the critics of the expectancy model were Graen (1969) Lawler (1971), Lawler and Porter (1967), and Porter and Lawler (1968). Their criticisms of the theory were based upon the expectancy model being too simplistic in nature; these critics started making adjustments to Vroom’s model. Pluraleyes keygen 2016.

Edward Lawler claims that the simplicity of expectancy theory is deceptive because it assumes that if an employer makes a reward, such as a financial bonus or promotion, enticing enough, employees will increase their productivity to obtain the reward. However, this only works if the employees believe the reward is beneficial to their immediate needs. For example, a $2 increase in salary may not be desirable to an employee if the increase pushes her into a tax bracket in which she believes her net pay is actually reduced, which is actually impossible in the United States with marginal tax brackets. Similarly, a promotion that provides higher status but requires longer hours may be a deterrent to an employee who values evening and weekend time with his children.

Vroom Motivation Model

Lawler’s new proposal for expectancy theory is not against Vroom’s theory. Lawler argues that since there have been a variety of developments of expectancy theory since its creation in 1964; the expectancy model needs to be updated. Lawler’s new model is based on four claims. First, whenever there are a number of outcomes, individuals will usually have a preference among those outcomes. Two, there is a belief on the part of that individual that their action(s) will achieve the outcome they desire. Three, any desired outcome was generated by the individual’s behavior. Finally, the actions generated by the individual were generated by the preferred outcome and expectation of the individual. Short film scripts pdf.

Workplace

Instead of just looking at expectancy and instrumentality, W.F. Maloney and J.M. McFillen found that expectancy theory could explain the motivation of those individuals who were employed by the construction industry. For instance, they used worker expectancy and worker instrumentality. Worker expectancy is when supervisors create an equal match between the worker and their job. Worker instrumentality is when an employee knows that any increase in their performance leads to achieving their goal.

Criticism Of Vroom 27s Expectancy Theory Of Motivation Quotes

In a chapter entitled 'On the Origins of Expectancy Theory' published in Great Minds in Management by Ken G. Smith and Michael A. Hitt, Vroom himself agreed with some of these criticisms and stated that he felt that the theory should be expanded to include research conducted since the original publication of his book.

Comments are closed.