Disk Speed Test For Mac

18.10.2020by
  1. Disk Speed Test For Mac
  2. U Disk Speed Test For Mac
  3. Disk Speed Test Mac Free Download

Best for: checking whether a disk is about to fail. The first handy thing. Autocad 2004 64 bit windows 7 crack password. Blackmagic Disk Speed Test for PC and Mac. Written by Blackmagic Design Inc. Category: Video Release date: 2018-10-24 Licence: Free Software version: 3.2 File size: 16.00 MB Compatibility: Windows 10/8.1/8/7/Vista and Mac OS X 10.10.0.


Benchmark your SSD or hard disk speed 17 comments Create New Account
Click here to return to the 'Benchmark your SSD or hard disk speed' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
That second command isn't going to measure the read speed of your disk at all. It's reading from /dev/zero and writing to /dev/null; both are virtual devices. The first command already wrote out a temporary file, so just read from that: For a better view of disk performance, these commands should be run with varying block sizes (bs=) and the results plotted. This is left as an exercise for the reader.

Thanks. The submission had the same command twice, and as it was anonymous, I couldn't contact the poster. I did some Googling and found that second command. It seemed to work for me, but I've changed it in the hint.

Test
---
Mac OS X Hints editor - Macworld senior contributor
http://www.mcelhearn.com

The read speed test is flawed as written. Using /dev/zero as dd's input and output file doesn't hit the disk at all and will return ridiculous speeds like 15-20 GB/sec. The proper way to do the read test is to be to dd the tstfile created by the write benchmark into /dev/null (but only after clearing the RAM cache by using the 'purge' command).
This one-liner will test the write speed, clear the cache, properly test the read speed, and then remove tstfile to reclaim disk space:
dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k of=tstfile count=1024 && purge && dd if=tstfile bs=1024k of=/dev/null count=1024 && rm tstfile

Here's what I get using this method (and dividing by 1048576 to get Mb/sec):
Internal laptop hd (7200 rpm, sata): Write=42.99 Mb/sec, Read=38.09 Mb/sec
External G-Raid (esata): Write=134.76 Mb/sec, Read=192.32 Mb/sec
External Seagate hd (laptop drive, USB-2): Write=33.59 Mb/sec, Read=36.38 Mb/sec
External G-Raid (Firewire 800): Write=60.79 Mb/sec, Read=66.17 Mb/sec
Encrypted sparsebundle image on external G-Raid above (esata): Write=68.66 Mb/sec, Read=81.33 Mb/sec

That's not really very fast for Thunderbolt.
I bought a Factory Refurb LaCie Little Big Drive for $229 (LaCie.com), removed the drives and the fan, and replaced the drives with a pair of SSDs. Using RAID0, I get around 450MB/s read and 360MB/s write speeds with every test I've tried. It's much faster than the internal SSD in my 2011 iMac.

Disk Speed Test For Mac

Yes, the WD My Book is a bit slower, but it has no fan, which is a big plus. I wonder, though, if I should be getting higher speeds.. Oh, BTW, I'm not using RAID 0. I'm using mine as two 2 TB disks. That cuts the speed in half.
---
Mac OS X Hints editor - Macworld senior contributor
http://www.mcelhearn.com

The freeware Xbench's Disk Test offers a nice method for getting a few different kinds of disk benchmarks.

To obtain speed expressed in MB/sec, just append the following string to each one of the commands: i.e: and No need to google around.

Also keep in mind it's only as fast as your system's slowest bottleneck. I realized this myself when I recently upgraded my internal HDD to SSD. Obviously I didn't do proper research. I got a top of the line model and was expecting super fast speeds around 460MB/s on SATA-III, only to realize that my 2008 MBP only has SATA-I so I get about 120 MB/s.
Probably still faster than HDD, but I never did measure the speed before I upgraded.

You wouldn't save a great deal of money going sata-I or II ssd and this way you are future proof if you'll get a new mac.

That thought had occurred to me too. However if I was going to upgrade my Macbook Pro the new one would probably already have SSD and wouldn't be user-replaceable (like in the new Retina Display version)

…or you can just use a disk benchmarking tool like bonnie, which is available to be installed from MacPorts.

When I tried:
time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k of=tstfile count=1024 2>&1 grep sec awk '{print 'scale = 2 ; '$(NF-1048576) '}' bc
I got:
awk: non-terminated string }cale = 2 .. at source line 1
context is
>>> <<<
awk: giving up
source line number 2
Mac OS X Lion 10.7.4

That awk line has an extra quote, it appears.
Any way, I found that this works:
time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k of=tstfile count=1024 2>&1 grep sec awk '{print $1 / 1024 / 1024 / $5, 'MB/sec' }'
You don't need bc at all, awk can do the arithmetic. I am dividing the total bytes by the total seconds and by
By the way, my standard internal drive in my 27' iMac (2.8GHz, a couple of years old) did the writing at 91 MB/sec.

Even better, leave out grep also. Awk can do its own pattern matching:
time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k of=tstfile count=1024 2>&1 awk '/sec/ {print $1 / $5 / 1048576, 'MB/sec' }'

One additional thing that might be worth mentioning..your test file (tstfile) should be larger than the amount of physical ram.
This prevents caching and artificially inflated read speeds. Allow me to demo this on my snazzy new iMac with the PCI-e drive..
The system has 16GB of ram, a 3.5 GHz i7 and 512 GB PCI-e SSD:
[email protected] (]> 01:19:24
~> time dd if=/dev/zero bs=2048k of=tstfile count=1024 2>&1 awk '/sec/ {print $1 / $5 / 1048576, 'MB/sec' }'
732.213 MB/sec
real 0m3.278s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m1.155s
Wow faaaast writes - love this drive..
now check the file size
[email protected] (]> 01:20:12
~>ls -al tstfile
-rw-r--r--+ 1 user staff 2147483648 Jan 4 13:30 tstfile
2GB, way less than 16GB.
Now lets Read it back..
[email protected] (]> 01:30:19
~> time dd if=tstfile bs=2048k of=/dev/null count=1024 2>&1 awk '/sec/ {print $1 / $5 / 1048576, 'MB/sec' }'
6262.12 MB/sec
real 0m0.329s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.329s
Mother of God!! 6.2 GB/sec!!
Hmmm..that can't be right.
So lets try a much larger test file.
NOTE: The file size does not *need* to exceed your total ram, just the amount you have free. If you feel this is a valuable use of your time ;) hint, hint -- then adjust block sizes and counts to just exceed the amount of free memory you have available.
Here Goes with a 16GB file:
[email protected] (]> 01:30:44
~> time dd if=/dev/zero bs=2048k of=tstfile count=8192 2>&1 awk '/sec/ {print $1 / $5 / 1048576, 'MB/sec' }'
728.792 MB/sec
real 0m22.583s
user 0m0.007s
sys 0m5.543s
Still bloody fast writes, yum.
Check the size (I always do)
[email protected] (]> 01:42:45
~>ls -al tstfile
-rw-r--r--+ 1 user staff 17179869184 Jan 4 13:42 tstfile
Yep, that one there is a whale that can't be crammed into my ram.
[email protected] (]> 01:42:49
~> time dd if=tstfile bs=2048k of=/dev/null count=8192 2>&1 awk '/sec/ {print $1 / $5 / 1048576, 'MB/sec' }'
779.598 MB/sec
real 0m21.018s
user 0m0.006s
sys 0m4.323s
Aaaah much more like it. And still pretty performant, yo.
One more thing to add and I don't know if was already mentioned or not tl:dr -- this is a sequential test only. iow - this is as fast as it gets and in no way indicative of how your drive performs when ~30-50% of its reads and writes are random - i.e. during regular multi application usage of the OS. ioMeter is the best open source benchmarker out there however they don't fully support OSX, just the worker engine binaries -- so iometer itself would have to run on a separate machine. But it's doable ;)

Disk Speed Test For Mac

Would anyone be able to tell me how to use these commands to test my USB 3.0 drives or Thunderbolt drives?

Just a quick note on possibilities available to do some bench-marking of NAS performance. Quite often Blackmagic Disk Speed Test or Intel NAS Performance Toolkit are being used for this. But there are some problems with those: first one is nice and cool but for Mac only, second is good but no longer supported by Intel as it reached its EoL.

So if you look for the other options you may use the following:

ToTu Soft LAN Speed Test – they have commercial and free versions, and promise to deliver Mac OS release soon.

NAS performance tester by Ulrik D. Hansen, absolutely free and with source code available (though it only measures read/write speed values).

U Disk Speed Test For Mac

I really liked this last option as it is portable and allowed me to do some quick tests against iSCSI target hosted on my Synology DS415+ (gigabit Ethernet connection; 1 drive only, no RAID, both data and header digests enabled). You may see test results below.

Using 400 Mb file:

The same test run a bit later with both header and data digests disabled:

Using 8000 Mb file:

May 31, 2019  Sherlock Holmes Season 3; Sherlock Season 1 2 3 Subtitle Indonesia Sherlock Season 1 2 3 Subtitle Indonesia Crime Drama Mystery TV Series 2010 Sherlock Season 1 2 3 Subtitle Indonesia Crime Drama Mystery TV Series 2010: Sinopsis – Unaired Pilot Invalided home from the war in Afghanistan, Dr. John Watson becomes roommates with the world’s. Mar 20, 2018  Genre: Crime, Drama, Mystery Channel: BBC Product: America / UK Format: MKV Release Date: 2010- Score: 9,2/10 English language Sherlock adalah serial drama televisi yang bertema kejahatan berdasarkan cerita Detektif Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.Sherlock (Benedict Cumberbatch) menamai pekerjaanya sebagai 'konsultan detektif' yang memecahkan berbagai misteri. Subtitle Indonesia Sherlock Holmes Season 3 Episode 1 Average ratng: 4,3/5 3858 reviews Sherlock Season 3 English Subtitles All Episodes Download. The third season of Sherlock aired from late January to February 2014. Download Subtitles For Sherlock (2010) Season 3 Episode 1 For Different Languages French, English, Spanish and many more, Sherlock (2010) S03E01 - my-subs.co. Sherlock holmes wiki.

And here is the same test with digests disabled:

Of course this is quick and dirty measurement, but at least now I have some baseline and tool to measure how changes in my infrastructure or its configuration influence performance. For example I saw interesting reports that NFS share on Synology outperform iSCSI target (at least in terms of IOps), and in other source there were graphs showing negligible performance cost of iSCSI digests (alongside these graphs that material emphasized importance of data integrity you gain with digests), but it will be nice to verify all these claims.

Disk Speed Test Mac Free Download

UPDATE (20.03.2015): I did the same tests with disabled digests (see additional screenshots above), so performance cost is not entirely negligible, especially for read and for large chunks of date.

Comments are closed.